Friday, June 23, 2017

You Want a Revolution

The purpose of this email is to bring the Friday-night dinner table full-circle. Please forward / like / tweet ....
In memory of my grandmother, Yehudis bas Alexander, whose yahrzeit is tonight.

Ultimate spinnerHere's a great question for your table tonight:

What do the following all have in common?

 
Hula-hoops (1950s)
• Frisbees (1960s)
• Yo-yos (1970-80s)
• Spinners (2010s)

If you want to say, "Short-lived fads that made somebody a millionaire", that would be to easy.

Why were they fads? What do they have in common?

Notice how they're all versions of the same basic idea: a round object that can be moved in a circle, used to pass time.

Notice also how they shrink over time.

The hula-hoop was trying to address a problem: How do you get people who don't want to move, to move?

It turns out that hula-hooping takes a lot of effort and practice.

So they said, if you're not going to move your whole body, how about at least your arm?

In comes the frisbee.

But that's a lot of effort, and requires you to actually go outdoors.

In comes the yo-yo.

But that didn't last long - it too takes time and effort to get really good at it.

(And it turns out that yo-yoing is an artform.)


Right about that time, home video games became popular. Beginning of sedentary America.

And finally someone thought, maybe we could at least get them to move a few fingers.

In comes the spinner.

The reason spinners are going to disappear about as quickly as they appeared is because they are too easily lost or forgotten.

But that's OK. Because we can see the trend and predict where it's going.

Notice the progression — hula-hoop, frisbee, yo-yo, spinner — not only are they reducing the amount of your body and effort needing to be involved, they are shrinking in size.

The next fad - you read it here first - is going to be the spinning ring.

Perhaps like the one above (you can click on that) or one of these.

Rhetorical question for your table: Will it solve the problem? (of course not)

I recently participated in an online conversation with a group of people comparing hiking in nature with playing video games.

Question for your table: Is there any comparison?

The video-game fans were annoyed and sometimes livid that anyone would suggest that sitting there gaming for hours and hours is not true happiness.

This problem was raised in 1964 by a couple of Jewish guys:
 

 
By 2015, another Jewish guy was declaring that it's still a problem: 
 
 
(Yes, believe it or not,  he's really quite Jewish.)
 
But just last week, some more Jewish guys seem to have found the solution, and guess what? It's really quite old:



(Hope you enjoy that as much as I did.)


Question for your table: Is the latter a true revolution?


Shabbat Shalom

PS -


Enjoyed this Table Talk? Vote with your fingers! Like it, tweet it, forward it or .... 

Friday, June 16, 2017

Are Two Heads Really Better?

The purpose of this blog is to bring some tête-à-tête to the dinner table. Please forward / like / tweet ....
In honor of 3 anniversaries: Marc & Lily, Joel and Lisa....and ours.
And happy birthday to Elliott in SF.

2-headsToday's lead question for your table: When are two heads better than one and when are they not?

This two-headed porpoise was caught recently in the North Sea.

(And if you think that's weird, you should see
some of truly ghastly mosters living down there.)

Can we agree that this is this is a case of two heads not being better than one?

So when are two heads better than one?

How about solving a problem.

For example, here is a Daniel Kahneman problem that very, very few people can solve on their own. You can try it, but chances are you'll need to talk it out with someone:


Reuven is looking at Sarah, but Sarah is looking at Shimon. Reuven is married, but Shimon is not. Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
  • A) Yes
  • B) No
  • C) Cannot be determined

+ + + + + + +

On their own, over 70 percent answer C.

On their own, they cannot fathom why A is the correct answer.


Try working together to see if you can understand why the correct answer is A.

Are two heads better?

Moving beyond problem-solving, pop-philosopher Alain de Botton is a big fan of that classic 2-headed arrangement known as marriage.

He argues that marriages are often on the rocks not because we married the wrong person but because we never learned how to love. In his brilliant lecture, he urges married people to do two things:


1. Change the way you respond to imperfection
2. Rather than look at compromise as a necessary evil, embrace the "nobility of compromise"

Speaking of compromise, and speaking of two heads, one of the most noble compromises a couple can make is to eat similar foods, especially when it comes to the pungents.

2 heads of garlicIn other words, if your partner eats garlic, so should you.

The purpose of your marriage is to travel the road together.

If she goes the garlic route, so should you. The evenings will pass so much more happily.


And you will finally understand the deeper meaning of "two heads are better than one."

Question for your table: Is there some wisdom here? Or has the rabbi finally gone mad?



Shabbat Shalom

PS - A book of 2-headed Jewish business wisdom
PPS What you get when talking heads sing

Enjoyed this Table Talk? Vote with your fingers! Like it, tweet it, forward it or .... 

Friday, June 09, 2017

Thought for Food

The purpose of this blog is to whet mental appetites around the Friday night dinner table. Please forward / like / tweet .... 
In memory of my grandparents, Lester and Sylvia Seinfeld (zichronam livracha) whose yahrzeits were observed this week.
 
This is something I witnessed this week in my very own home.

(<== no, not this)

Did you ever witness something like the following in your home?

Child is staring into a full fridge.

Child complains: "There's nothing to eat!"




Is something wrong with this picture?

The parent sees this:full-fridge

But somehow the child sees this:


























First question for your table: How does this happen?

I think the disconnect may be explained by a related scenario:

Child: "What's for dinner?"

Parent answers.

Child: "Again? I'm so bored of that!"

Second question for your table: What's the difference between hunger and appetite?

Third question for your table: Why is it so hard to lose 10 pounds??????


No food

Shabbat Shalom

PS - There are 4 hidden links in this post. In addition, I recently bought this and recommend it.

Enjoyed this Table Talk? Vote with your fingers!
Like it, tweet it, forward it or ....